|
|
Threatened forest species (4.8)
 |
| Grey snail (Bulgarica cana) is an extremely endangered species in
Finland. |
Monitoring of threatened29 species yields information about
changes in forest ecosystems. It is estimated that there are
about 45,000 species living in Finland, about half of which
have their habitat in the forest. In the latest evaluation from
2010 21,400 species were assessed. About one tenth of them
– 2,247 species – were classified as threatened. This percentage has not changed significantly from the previous evaluation.
Forest is the primary habitat for 814 threatened species (36%
of the total). Of the threatened forest species, 82% live in herbrich
forests and old-growth heathland forests. The taxonomic
groups with the greatest number of threatened forest species
are invertebrates and fungi. Changes in the forest habitat, especially
the reduction in decaying wood, is the most common
threat for forest species.
The Finnish evaluation of threatened species is the among of the
most extensive assessments in the world. Similar evaluations
have been made only in Sweden and Norway. The evaluation
of 2010 made – for the second time – use of the international
classification of threatened species, the IUCN classification.
Based on the two consecutive, comparable evaluations carried
out between a period of 10 years, comparison of development
was possible for the first time.
The rate of decline of certain forest species has slowed down in
Finland, or in some cases even stopped since the 1990s, although
it has not been possible to halt the decline in the forest species
overall. Actual taxonomic changes in the number of threatened
forest species between 2000 and 2010 demonstrate that positive
changes in threatened status had occurred in 81 species. About
half of these are beetles, many of which have benefited from
retention trees at harvesting sites, particularly aspen.
By contrast, 108 species whose primary habitat is the forest
have experienced a deterioration. The trend was particularly
significant for lichen. The classification of 34 species of lichen
was upgraded, and none were downgraded. Similar negative
trends were found among species of butterfly, beetle and hymenoptera.
Factors in forest use constitute the principal cause in the decline
for 606 species, or 74% of all threatened forest species. Forest
management measures may have reduced the number of certain
habitat types such as old-growth forests in their natural
state while also weakening the quality of some forest habitats.
The number of threatened species is growing the fastest in traditional
rural biotopes, of which wooded pastures and grazed
forests are wooded land.
Table 4.8. Number of threatened forest and mire species
Primary habitat of species |
Vertebrates |
Invertebrates |
Vascular plants |
Cryptogams |
Fungi and lichens |
Total |
|
Year |
2000 |
2010 |
2000 |
2010 |
2000 |
2010 |
2000 |
2010 |
2000 |
2010 |
2000 |
2010 |
Species, grand total |
383 |
|
26,600 |
|
3,200 |
|
5,900 |
|
6,906 |
|
43,000 |
|
The data was considered sufficient for evaluation of threatened species |
346 |
|
8,599 |
|
1,208 |
|
901 |
|
4,027 |
|
15,081 |
|
Threatened species, total |
50 |
|
759 |
|
180 |
|
142 |
|
374 |
|
1,505 |
|
Forests |
12 |
14 |
252 |
476 |
35 |
32 |
15 |
18 |
250 |
274 |
564 |
814 |
Old heathland forests |
4 |
2 |
69 |
80 |
- |
|
1 |
8 |
70 |
76 |
144 |
166 |
Other heathland forests |
3 |
4 |
10 |
37 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
|
24 |
18 |
41 |
63 |
Old herb-rich forests |
1 |
1 |
58 |
66 |
- |
1 |
8 |
7 |
32 |
32 |
99 |
107 |
Other herb-rich forests |
2 |
1 |
64 |
140 |
26 |
21 |
4 |
3 |
120 |
112 |
216 |
277 |
Old-forest, general |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
12 |
Esker forests |
- |
|
15 |
104 |
6 |
6 |
- |
|
- |
2 |
21 |
112 |
Forest-fire areas |
- |
|
29 |
6 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
4 |
29 |
10 |
Birch stands in mountains |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Other forests |
2 |
|
7 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
14 |
|
Forests general |
|
6 |
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
65 |
Peatlands |
1 |
6 |
14 |
46 |
18 |
21 |
25 |
18 |
9 |
13 |
67 |
104 |
Fens |
- |
|
3 |
14 |
17 |
19 |
13 |
12 |
4 |
8 |
37 |
53 |
Bogs |
1 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
17 |
Pine mires |
- |
1 |
5 |
13 |
- |
|
- |
|
1 |
1 |
6 |
15 |
Spruce mires |
- |
|
2 |
5 |
- |
|
9 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
11 |
Other peatlands |
- |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
4 |
|
Peatlands general |
|
1 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
Watercourses |
20 |
|
48 |
|
11 |
|
21 |
|
3 |
|
103 |
|
Shoreline areas |
5 |
|
98 |
|
37 |
|
9 |
|
13 |
|
162 |
|
Exposed bedrock |
- |
|
11 |
|
14 |
|
56 |
|
44 |
|
125 |
|
Fells |
6 |
|
16 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
10 |
|
63 |
|
Man-made environments etc. |
6 |
|
320 |
|
50 |
|
- |
|
45 |
|
421 |
|
Source: Rassi, P., Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A. & Mannerkoski, I. (eds.) 2010: The 2010 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. 685 p.; Rassi, P., Alanen, A., Kanerva, T. & Mannerkoski, I. (eds.) 2001. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus 2000. [Endangered species in Finland 2000]
Links
29 Endangerment refers to the probability of the species becoming extinct. Anthropogenic
and non-anthropogenic causes of endangerment are not distinguished
in the assessment of endangerment. All threatened species are classified
as critically endangered, vulnerable and endangered. |