Re: info

• Subject: Re: info
• From: Robert Froese <taganov@INTERCHANGE.UBC.CA>
• Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 14:42:57 -0700
• Approved-By: jarmo.saarikko@METLA.FI
• In-Reply-To: <748f52e6.3613dcb6@aol.com>
• Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19981001144257.009342f0@pop.interchange.ubc.ca>

At 03:49 PM 10/1/98 EDT, you wrote:
>In case you've missed the press coverage, it's silviculture and logging that
>CAUSED the flooding, according to the Chinese government.  I hardly think the
>answer to the question is MORE logging...

Yes, I'm told the Chinese government has sent all foresters off to a state
school for "re-education".  The Chinese are particularly good at this, at
least according to my understanding of history.

I'm sure the reliability of media reports from China has not degraded in
the past few years, either, making the flooding a simple issue to sort out
here in North America.

        ...R

Robert Froese, BSF, FIT                        | taganov@interchange.ubc.ca
Analyst, J.S. Thrower and Associates Ltd.      |
MF Candidate, Dept. For. Res. Mgmt., UBC       | VE7MOQ

• Re: info
• From: DavidOrr@aol.com

• Prev: Forest products markets in 1998 and 1999
• Next: Re: Rural Develpment Forestry and Agroforestry
• Index: Forest mailing list October 1998
• Thread: Forest list subjects in October 1998