Forest list archive: msg00055

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Patrick's prattling



Patrick Moore wrote:
>
> The issue of soil loss by landslides is important, but in British
> Columbia this is a minuscule amount of the total area. Yes, even small
> landslides can cause negative impacts on salmon streams and should be
> avoided. But it is also very clear that overfishing, hydro-electric dams,
> agriculture, and urbanization, are far more destructive of salmon than
> logging, the effects of which are temporary as the impact of soil erosion is
> easily healed in time.

Patrick, this is the typical corporate public relations spin to divert
attention away from the problems.  Unless you are travelling around this
province with your eyes closed you know as well as I do that there are a
good number of pretty gross landslides around here as a result of piss
poor logging practices.  They might be miniscule to you, but they have
caused major havoc with watersheds and fish habitat, among other things.

The statement on salmon is yet another typical response by the
corporations to attempt to divert attention away from logging
practices.  I know, I have sat in meetings where every time fish habitat
came up the industry flacks would start discussing how to frame a
plausible denial of any responsibility.  No one is going to deny that
agriculture, urbanization, hydro, etc. has had its toll on the fishery.
It has.  But the issue here is forestry, and the point is to improve
forestry practices, not avoid doing so by blaming something else for the
problem.

Patrick Moore wrote:
>
> Immoral is a big word to apply to the obtaining of wood by hard work. I
> would think twice about characterizing the people who do this work for all
> the rest of us as "immoral".

Well, Patrick, I am not apply the word immoral to the obtaining of wood
by hard work, nor am I characterizing forestry workers as "immoral."  In
fact Patrick, I know a lot of people in the woods who are disgusted with
some of the ways that they have to do things, but then families need to
eat, so they keep working and hope for changes.  What is immoral is the
policies and senior corporate officials who allow this kind of shoddy
forestry to happen in the first place.  What is immoral is allowing
economic factors to overrule good biology.  What is immoral is hiring
spin doctors and forming phoney citizens groups to change perceptions
rather than taking steps to correct the problem.

Jerry West
Editor/publisher/janitor
----------------------------------------------------
THE RECORD
On line news from Nootka Sound & Canada's West Coast
An independent, progessive regional publication
http://www.island.net/~record/


Follow-Ups: References:

[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0