Forest list archive: msg00030

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

[Fwd: Sierra Club Suit (was forest terminology)]




Date: Sun, 05 Apr 1998 14:43:55 -0400
From: "B. Diamond" <bdiamond@athens.net>
Subject: Re: Sierra Club Suit (was forest terminology)
To: "Michael B. Sullivan" <mbsullivan@Magnolia.CFR.MsState.Edu>
Message-id: <3527D0EA.2A0CB4D@athens.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
Content-type: text/plain; x-mac-creator=4D4F5353; x-mac-type=54455854;
 charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine.ANSI.3.93.980405131329.10507A-100000@Magnolia>



Michael B. Sullivan wrote:

> Speaking of environmental, did you hear what the Sierra Club has done?  I
> guess everyone is familar with the south and how we practice Best
> Management Practices (BMP) own our own.  Well, the EPA doesn't mind that
> because they see that the south has a good response to self-imposed BMP's.
> Although, the Sierra Club didn't think that that was a good idea.  So,
> they took the EPA to court and won.  I guess in the near future forestry
> in the south will change as we know it.  I mean, hasn't the New England
> states proved that manditory BMP laws doesn't really help anything.  I
> guess the Sierra Club doesn't really give a hoot (no pun intended to the
> Pacific Northwest) about the people and their welfare.  I guess I'll get
> of my soap box, now.  Email me your opinions on this subject.
>

Brad,

    On what legal grounds did the Sierra Club win their suit?  Do the SE
BMP's fail to meet NFMA, FLPMA, or other law's requirements?

BD



[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0