Re: Forest Terminology

• Subject: Re: Forest Terminology
• From: "Michael B. Sullivan" <mbsullivan@Magnolia.CFR.MsState.Edu>
• Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 13:22:57 -0500
• Approved-By: "Michael B. Sullivan" <mbsullivan@MAGNOLIA.CFR.MSSTATE.EDU>
• In-Reply-To: <01BD5F2E.1692DDA0@jpcerda.conama.cl>
• Message-ID: <Pine.ANSI.3.93.980405131329.10507A-100000@Magnolia>

Speaking of environmental, did you hear what the Sierra Club has done?  I
guess everyone is familar with the south and how we practice Best
Management Practices (BMP) own our own.  Well, the EPA doesn't mind that
because they see that the south has a good response to self-imposed BMP's.
Although, the Sierra Club didn't think that that was a good idea.  So,
they took the EPA to court and won.  I guess in the near future forestry
in the south will change as we know it.  I mean, hasn't the New England
states proved that manditory BMP laws doesn't really help anything.  I
guess the Sierra Club doesn't really give a hoot (no pun intended to the
Pacific Northwest) about the people and their welfare.  I guess I'll get
of my soap box, now.  Email me your opinions on this subject.

Here's hoping your seedlings never J-root,

Brad

• Re: Forest Terminology
• From: Juan Pablo C erda <jpcerda@conama.cl>

• Prev: Re: Environmental Coalition Communication Packet. (fwd)
• Next: Re: Forest Terminology
• Index: Forest mailing list April 1998
• Thread: Forest list subjects in April 1998