On Tue, 13 May 1997, Edilberto Tadulan x2461 Research wrote: Edilberto, I have found your data very useful, but can you send me the reference for it? Thank you. Jean-Claude > I am not sure if the data presented below have been posted in > this discussion group. It might help in putting into perpective the > arguments between CO2 and population. > > Carbon Emissions (million tons)from Fossil Fuel Burning (1994) > Country: Total Emissions: Emissions/Person: Emissions/Dollar GNP > > 1. USA 1,371 5.26 210 > 2. China 835 0.71 330 > 3. Russia 455 3.08 590 > 4. Japan 299 2.39 110 > 5. Germany 234 2.89 140 > 6. India 222 0.24 160 > 7. UK 153 2.62 150 > 8. Ukraine 125 2.43 600 > 9. Canada 116 3.97 200 > 10. Italy 104 1.81 110 > 11. France 90 1.56 80 > 12. Poland 89 2.31 460 > 13. S. Korea 88 1.98 200 > 14 Mexico 88 0.96 140 > 15 S Africa 85 2.07 680 > 16 Kazakstan 81 4.71 1,250 > 17 Australia 75 4.19 230 > 18 N Korea 67 2.90 960 > 19 Iran 62 1.09 270 > 20 Brazil 60 0.39 70 > > The data presented reflect several differences from different > countries, including energy wastefulness in the former Soviet Union, > extensive reliance on automobiles in the US, high levels of > efficiency in Japan, heavy use of coal in China and South Africa, and > the extensive use of non-carbon-emitting hydropower and biomass > energy in Brazil. > > While the developing countries are taking the blame of population > overcrowding and economic growth - hence more CO2 emissions, are the > developed countries not guilty of extravagant lifestyle and failure > to address the CO2 build up? > > Edd L. Tadulan >
Mail converted by
MHonArc 1.1.0