Forest list archive: msg00055

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: CO2 sequestration vs fossil fuel emissions



At 03:39 PM 5/7/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Dear FOREST readers
>
>David South posted a question for me on where I would prefer to have how
>much plantations established to meet future wood demands. It would ofcourse
>be impossible for me to give exact figures so I will not try do do so. David
>was probably trying to trick me, but is is apparent that he wants more
>plantations.

---clip----

>Thor Hjarsen
>Centre for Tropical Biodiversity
>Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen
>Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
>Fax: + 45 35 32 10 10
>E-mail: THjarsen@zmuc.ku.dk


Dear Thor:

You are right, I was trying to trick you into reading my paper entitled
How Can We Feign Sustainability With An Increasing Population?

http://www.forestry.auburn.edu/coops/sfnmc/class/feign.html

Apparently, the trick did not work. My reasons for supporting tree
plantations are clearly stated in the abstract.

============================================================================
=======

ABSTRACT

Attitudes of human societies towards tree plantations can be a critical
factor in determining the source of wood supply in the future. Since human
populations will expand substantially in the southern hemisphere,
considerable increases in the demands on native forests will occur.
Currently, only a limited amount of tree plantations have been established
specifically to provide firewood in developing countries. This may be due in
part to a world society that has evolved a general preference for pastures
but aversion to tree plantations. In total, pastureland and tree plantations
amount to 26% and 1% of the world's landbase, respectively. Nevertheless,
our actions today will determine if children in the future collect firewood
from natural stands or from tree plantations. It is estimated that a
substantial afforestation program could increase the amount of tree
plantations to equal 5% of the world's landbase by the year 2050. Ten
billion dollars (U.S.) is a rough estimate of the annual costs for such a
program (assuming no overhead or administrative costs). Most of the wood
needs could come from these plantations. However, if the world's society
wants most wood in 2050 to come from natural stands (>80%), then tree
plantations can be limited to just 1% of the landbase.

Keywords: population growth, carrying capacity, plantations, firewood



David South
School of Forestry
Auburn University, AL  36849-5418



dsouth@forestry.auburn.edu

334-844-1022
334-844-1084 (FAX)


As always, views expressed here are my own
(and I am not speaking on the behalf of others).


I use only 100% post-consumer paper in my home printer.
(discarded used office paper printed on one side)


http://www.forestry.auburn.edu/coops/sfnmc/sfnmc.html

=========================================================================
The world population is expected to double by the year 2100.
Therefore the annual demand for wood for energy (etc.)
will increase and might double (to more than 7 billion m3/yr).
To provide plantation wood for people in the future,
support the planting of trees on pastureland.
Set a goal of converting 8 million ha of pastureland/yr for the next 55 years.
This would increase tree plantations to about 5% of the world's landbase.
=========================================================================

Support Zero Population Growth for the United States

http://www.igc.apc.org/zpg/index.html



Follow-Ups:

[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0