To members of the Forest List, > While the production of steel products may result in more CO2 emmissions, it > certainly would help the situation if we weren't cutting down 600 year old forests > and replacing them with 1/2" diameter seedlings. How much CO2 do those > seedlings scrub, patrick? And since when do CO2 emmisions have anything to do > with nuclear waste (which, I'd like to point out, most environmentalists oppose)? For a more informed & researched documentation on nuclear radiation, please refer to: The Bikini Atoll Home Page http://www.bikiniatoll.com Nuclear reactors are a means to generate electricity for both domestic & industrial consumption. Thus, nuclear waste is an end-product. Many Third-World countries became dumping grounds for both nuclear & toxic waste from the G7 countries. Not surprising therefore that those in the West would gloss over its danger. God bless. Nelson Wong MTC
Mail converted by
MHonArc 1.1.0