Fyi. I don't think this was successful whtn I sent this out earlier today. If you get more than once, please forgive me. Thanks, Gyde
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 10:33:38 -0400 From: Gyde Lund <gklund@worldnet.att.net> Subject: US FGDC Veg Classification Standards (Draft 18 March 97) To: forest net <FOREST@listserv.funet.fi>, eco-tech <eco-tech@umdd.umd.edu> Cc: "smith, brad dg" </s=w.b.smith/ou1=w01c@mhs-fswa.attmail.com>, "janz, klaus" <klaus.janz@fao.org>, "korotkov, alex" <alexander.korotkov@unece.org>, "brown, sandra" <british@carbon.cor.epa.gov> Reply-to: gklund@worldnet.att.net Message-id: <3368A9C2.FDD@worldnet.att.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-WorldNet (Win95; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit The latest version of the U.S. Draft Vegetation Classification Standards may be found at: http://www.nbs.gov/fgdc.veg/ These have been revised based upon a public review held last June and coordinated with the United Nations FAO Land Cover Classification initiative. The draft standards have been presendted to the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee Standards Working Group. The SWG has completed their review and will be recommending either further revision, further public review or adoption as the U.S. standard. Gyde
Mail converted by
MHonArc 1.1.0