Forest list archive: msg00145

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: I: ActiveX Security Issues 1



To members of the Forest List especially Systems Administrators,

Here are some information for you to take note:

>    Microsoft Moves To Allay
>    ActiveX Security Worries
>    [Image] (02/20/97; 7:22 p.m. EST)
>    By Clare Haney, TechWire
> 
>    Recently, the debate about the relative security
>    merits of Microsoft's ActiveX components vs. Java
>    applets has reached fever pitch. User concerns
>    regarding the level of security offered by
>    Microsoft's ActiveX controls have forced the company
>    into offering advice on Internet security on its
>    website.
> 
>    The move may be a reaction to a demonstration given
>    by a hackers association late last month on German
>    television exposing security flaws in ActiveX. As
>    reported in TechWire, members of the Chaos Computer
>    Club (CCC) were allegedly able to transfer funds
>    illegally from Intuit's Quicken accountancy software
>    using an ActiveX control to modify a user's Quicken
>    transaction file.
> 
>    On Thursday, Microsoft took the unusual step of
>    publishing an open letter to users from company
>    Senior Vice President Brad Silverberg on its security
>    web page. In the letter, Silverberg refers directly
>    to the CCC demo. "While it is unfortunate that
>    hackers have created this harmful program, it does
>    point out the need for users to act cautiously and
>    responsibly on the Internet, just as they do in the
>    physical world." He concluded, "We expect hackers and
>    virus writers to get increasingly sophisticated, but
>    we pledge we'll continue to keep you and us one step
>    ahead of them."
> 
>    Microsoft has also made its Web Executable Security
>    Advisor program available free on its website
>    http://www.microsoft.com/security. The program aims
>    to help keep users up to date with Internet security
>    issues, particularly those related to Microsoft
>    software, by cobbling together a mix of new data with
>    relevant information already existing on the
>    company's website. Microsoft also announced its
>    intention to hold a Web Executable Security
>    roundtable in mid-spring so it can directly poll
>    customers on what kind of balance they would like to
>    see being struck between functionality and security
>    for downloadable applications.
> 
>    Intuit, initially rather blasé about the hackers'
>    demo, took the opportunity this week to state that if
>    users did have concerns about ActiveX's security,
>    that they "should consider disabling the ActiveX
>    capability in their browser or using a browser such
>    as Netscape Navigator, which does not support
>    ActiveX." The company is also rushing out a more
>    secure German version that will be equivalent to the
>    current U.S. release.
> 
>    Out Of The Frying Pan, Into The Sandbox
> 
>    The renewed secured debate extends beyond the ActiveX
>    arena. In its defense, Microsoft still continues to
>    holler that the German hacker incident is not just
>    limited to ActiveX, but affects any executable, be
>    they Java applets, Navigator plug-ins, PostScript
>    files, Apple Macintosh applications and Word macros.
> 
>    Java's sandbox technology, which ensures that Java
>    applets can not access or contaminate a user's
>    computer resources, such as the operating system or
>    hard drive, is also coming under scrutiny.
> 
>    Tod Nielson, general manager of developer relations
>    at Microsoft, claimed that the development of any
>    significant Java application, for example, a
>    checkbook reconciliation application, needs to occur
>    outside the safety of the sandbox. "You can't build
>    anything more than eye candy or dancing hippos inside
>    the sandbox," he quipped.
> 
>    Marianne Mueller, security staff engineer at JavaSoft
>    in Mountain View, Calif., disagreed with that
>    statement, claiming the sandbox is not nearly so
>    limiting to development as Microsoft suggests. She
>    also claimed that Java is much more secure than
>    ActiveX, explaining, "With ActiveX you're pretty much
>    at all times subject to applications, whether
>    maliciously or due to bugs, being able to damage your
>    underlying code. Java was architected from the start
>    not to let that happen."
> 
>    Edward W. Felten, assistant professor in the
>    department of computer science at Princeton
>    University and co-author of Java Security: Hostile
>    Applets, Holes and Antidotes, sided with JavaSoft. "I
>    believe there's a fundamental difference between
>    ActiveX and Java, as it is currently shipping.
>    ActiveX relies on people making a good decision,
>    whereas the Java sandbox relies on technology to
>    prevent something bad from happening."
> 
>    But Felten stressed that the situation is changing as
>    Java opens out more beyond the sandbox. The latest
>    release of the Java Development Kit, version 1.1,
>    which appeared last week, supports digital
>    signatures, also known as code signing, so users can
>    identify the originator of an application and
>    download applets completely outside of the Java
>    sandbox. Microsoft already offers code signing with a
>    feature known as Authenticode, which is part of its
>    web browser, Internet Explorer 3.0.
> 
>    JavaSoft said it is planning a more fine-grained
>    approach to security in the next major release of its
>    software. This means applications will only be let
>    out of the sandbox to perform very narrowly defined
>    tasks, for example, ensuring that an applet only
>    accesses a specific database without being able to
>    influence anything else on an end user's computer.
> 
>    The World Wide Web Consortium standards body has just
>    completed the specification for a digital signature
>    standard and is about to enter the implementation
>    phase. Microsoft has submitted its Authenticode
>    technology for approval, but JavaSoft said it
>    believes that its submission is likely to play a much
>    more significant role. "The W3's standard will be
>    essentially the same as our digital signature
>    technology," Mueller said.
> 
>    Once there's a standard digital signature, the next
>    area to be addressed regarding Internet security is
>    firewalls. Mueller revealed that JavaSoft will be
>    hosting a discussion for firewall next week on safe
>    firewall traversal. "We'll debate what needs to be
>    done to allow specialized intelligent filtering at
>    the firewall level."
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------

God bless.


Nelson Wong
MTC




[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0