Re: To burn or not to burn?

• To: Multiple recipients of list FOREST <FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI>
• Subject: Re: To burn or not to burn?
• From: AIRjacobs@AOL.COM
• Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 09:55:54 -0400
• content-length: 451
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
• Reply-To: FOREST Mailing list on forest research and studies <FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI>
• Sender: OWNER-FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI

In a message dated 96-09-03 17:41:01 EDT, you write:

<< In a blatent display of self-serving fear-mongering, the timber industry
 has renewed it's efforts to frighten the public into the further
 destruction of our national forests in the name of "fire protection." >>

The latest issue of National Geographic has a feature story on the topic of
fire and the forest. I have always felt that N.G. provides an unbiased view.
You might want to read it.

• Prev: Re: To burn or not to burn?
• Next: Re: To burn or not to burn?
• Index: Forest mailing list September 1996
• Thread: Forest list subjects in September 1996