Re: export grade red oak: A COMPLAINT.

• To: Multiple recipients of list FOREST <FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI>
• Subject: Re: export grade red oak: A COMPLAINT.
• From: Knut Veisten <knut.veisten@NLH10.NLH.NO>
• Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 13:20:58 +0200
• content-length: 497
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
• Reply-To: FOREST Mailing list on forest research and studies <FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI>
• Sender: OWNER-FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI

At 20:00 28.03.96 -0500, George Pope wrote:

>Where is a good place to present commercial forestry oportunities on the
>net? We need one. What's wrong with here?

If we take a look at the name of this list:

"FOREST Mailing list on forest research and studies."

Doesn't this very name makes it clear "what's wrong with" presenting
commercial forestry here?


If not, I'll join the choir shouting:

Please, keep this list FREE from commercial forestry !!!


Knut Veisten
<knut.veisten@isf.nlh.no>

• Prev: Re: adverts on the list
• Index: Forest mailing list March 1996
• Thread: Forest list subjects in March 1996