Forest list archive: msg00070

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Smart Wood Statement on Flor y Fauna



Dear Richard Donovan and forestry colleagues,

OHRA have for months claimed to have official FSC certification for Flor y
Fauna plantations; eg in full page adverts in largest circultaion NL
newspaper "De Telegraaf", and more recently WWF-NLhas joined in with their
own publication with new FSC logo on front cover. Flor y Fauna have made
same claims in court before a judge. Treemail has communicated its concerns
on these matters and provided copies of such claims to Rainforest Alliance
and FSC, and suggested to contact Professor R.A.A. Oldeman as witness of
court hearing statement by Flor y Fauna's legal representative (court
hearings are public in The Netherlands). Rainforest Alliance has not
contacted Professor Oldeman on this matter.

Following correspondence relevant to the issue from Treemail to Richard
Donovan, Director Smartwood programme of Rainforest Alliance, in response to
a 9 page fax to our office of end of January 1996, has remained unanswered.
Now that Rainforest Alliance has decided to take this matter to internet
discussion lists, perhaps Richard Donovan would be inclined to redress this
situation. This may be opportune given that his internet release states
"Smart Wood is now working to verify Flor y Fauna's advertising claims with
respect to FSC and/or Smart Wood. If deliberately misleading claims have
been made by others, then appropriate actions will be taken", and given the
recent FSC statement to the effect that "The expression "FSC-certified" is
incorrect.  Any claims that plantations have been in any way "FSC-certified"
are doubly incorrect".

Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 10:16:24
To: smartwood@igc.apc.org
From: Paul Romeijn <treemail@vr.nl>
Subject: Opportunities missed again
Cc: fsc@laneta.apc.org

Dear Richard,

Please check your mail from me to you of 7 January 1996. You will find copy
of letter PR to RD on subject opportunities missed, which was also mailed to
FSCs TS. Opening sentence to RD reads:

I regret to inform you that your interventions have not succeeded in
preventing F&F stating in court on 28 December 1995 that F&F plantations
have been oficially certified by the FSC ...

This letter is on the listing of communications in RDs letter to all of
December 1996, which according to RD should have date 28 January 1996, and
which was actually faxed to our office on 30 January 1996. In same
communication RD states on last page:

We are not aware that FyF has ever made such a claim.

This thread leads to RD informing PR on 5 February 1996 that: "I will now be
following up on it." This here appears one entire month lost in clarifying
the situation.

Please clarify to all the discrepancy between above statements.

CC: BC, TS, JC

[end of letter]

NB:

Above reference to letter to "all" from RD, according to its header, was
mailed to:

Bruce Cabarly, FSC Board of Directors
Tim Synnott, FSC Executive Ditector
with cc:
Julio Centeno
Arnold Von Krefeld, WWF/Netherlands
Paul Romeijn
Joop van Veen & Jan Van Rossum, Van Rossum Van Veen Consultants




[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0