Re: Rate of return in forestry

• To: Multiple recipients of list FOREST <FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI>
• Subject: Re: Rate of return in forestry
• From: Nelson Wong <nelson@MGATE.MTC.COM.MY>
• Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 14:16:23 +0800
• content-length: 1236
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <v01520d01ad4833389284@[132.181.222.11]>
• Reply-To: FOREST Mailing list on forest research and studies <FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI>
• Sender: OWNER-FOREST@LISTSERV.FUNET.FI

Dear Dr. Bilek,

On Thu, 15 Feb 1996, Ted Bilek wrote:

> Dear listmembers,
>
> While I agree that 20% seems most unrealistic as a planning basis for a
> forestry investment, I just wanted to point out that 2-4% is far worse than
> we expect in New Zealand.  I'm also curious what rates of return are
> expected elsewhere.  I'll be happy to summarize any information I receive
> on this for a future posting to the list.
>
This is certainly a very good idea. List members should include info eg.
species, temperate, tropical, boreal, etc. Here, at the MTC, we are
providing assistance in reforestation and tree plantations. Such info
will be most timely and useful. Thanks in advance.
>
> Ted
>
>     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>     | Ted Bilek, Forestry Economics                     |
>     | University of Canterbury, School of Forestry      |
>     | Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND       |
>     |                                                   |
>     | e-mail: e.bilek@fore.canterbury.ac.nz             |
>     | phone: 64-3-364-2121   fax:  64-3-364-2124        |
>     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
Nelson Wong
Malaysian Timber Council
http://www.mtc.com.my

• Rate of return in forestry
• From: Ted Bilek <t.bilek@FORE.CANTERBURY.AC.NZ>

• Prev: Tropical and latin american forestry
• Next: Re: Vegetation field data & handheld computers
• Index: Forest mailing list February 1996
• Thread: Forest list subjects in February 1996