Arguments against tree farms / plantations

• To: forest@nic.funet.fi (Forest Scientists, ALL MEMBERS)
• Subject: Arguments against tree farms / plantations
• From: GEOFFREY DEAN <nfpdean@cerebus.ozemail.com.au>
• Date: Sat, 25 Feb 1995 14:18:45 +1100
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
• Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd
• Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 1995 14:18:45 +1100
• Resent-From: forest-owner@nic.funet.fi
• Resent-Message-Id: <01HNGE0KUVL08WZCN2@palmu.metla.fi>
• Resent-To: mesinfo@pihta.metla.fi
• Sender: GEOFFREY DEAN <nfpdean@cerebus.ozemail.com.au>

 Greetings from 
 the land down under  the land down under!  

 Can members indicate for me arguments that the environmental movement, or 
others,  have put up against tree farms / plantations? 
 a) most commonly
 b) most effectively

Comments / references / arguments are all welcome, and appreciated.

Geoff Dean 8-)
North Forest Products
Postal: PO box 63, Ridgley 7320, Tasmania, Australia
Street: Waratah Crescent, Ridgley 7320, Tasmania, Australia
ph +61-04-34-3424
fx +61-04-34-3400
email: nfpdean@ozemail.com.au

• Prev: The trouble with statistics
• Next: Last call for World Directory of Forest Geneticists
• Index: Forest mailing list February 1995
• Thread: Forest list subjects in February 1995