To: Network Administrator (Jarmo Sarrikko)
Dear Jarmo:
I sent a similar message about this last week to <forest-request> but it got
'bounced' with a non-delivery message. Others have also complained about the
same thing (see note from Michael Meuser below) So I am repeating my concern
to you today.
Several messages, most notable from Scott Roberts at Purdue (part of which
copied below), were repeatedly sent to over the net in the past 5 days..
Hopefully you can investigate and eliminate the problem in future.
Thanks
*******************************************************
JIM ARNOTT
Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service
506 West Burnside Road
Victoria, B.C. V8Z 1M5, Canada
Internet: JARNOTT@A1.PFC.Forestry.CA
Phone: +1-604-363-0701 Fax: +1-604-363-0775
*******************************************************
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 01-Dec-1994 09:23am PDT
From: meuser@cats.ucsc.edu
meuser@cats.ucsc.edu@SMTP@PFC
Dept:
Tel No:
TO: forest@nic.funet.fi ( forest@nic.funet.fi@SMTP@PFC )
TO: Scott=Roberts%Faculty%fnr@forest1.f ( Scott=Roberts%Faculty%fnr@forest1.fnr.purdue.edu@SMTP@PFC )
Subject: Re: Nat. Forests=parks?
Has anyone else gotten 7 or 8 copies of the post beginning, "douglas, I
suspect..."? I have and I can't figure out why.
Mike
Michael R. Meuser
Sociology Board
Stevenson College
University of California
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
408-458-4245
meuser@cats.ucsc.edu
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 30-Nov-1994 09:20pm PDT
From: Scott=Roberts%Faculty%fnr@fore
Scott=Roberts%Faculty%fnr@forest1.fnr.purdue.edu@SMTP@PFC
Dept:
Tel No:
TO: forest@nic.funet.fi ( forest@nic.funet.fi@SMTP@PFC )
Subject: Re: Nat. Forests=parks?
Douglas,
I suspect the answer will be 'b', the National Forests will continue to
produce some modest to moderate level of harvest. I think there are a number
of reasons for this. Harvest from the National Forests has gone from a high
of nearly 6 billion board feet in 1987 to around 1.5 bbf in 1993.
Mail converted by
MHonArc 1.1.0