Forest list archive: msg00016

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Agencies Defy Court Order to Avoid Wildlife Protection]





To:    David Hodges <hodges@indirect.com>
    
    David,
    I do not believe you owe anybody an apology except for writing your
    metaphorical representation of the message you replied to. I will explain.
    
    Firstly you had a valid point about the schools: the main chippers here also
    target schools (eg. blackboard kindly donated by "so-and-so" etc.). 
    
    What continues to be offensive to me is, partly name calling, but mainly that 
    PR outputs from the timber
    industry (even on BBs) never seem to take their waste into account. Eg. the
    lost production areas due to roads and landings, lost vegetation due to
    burning (including heaps of "slashings") and most importantly that (here
    in Tasmania at least) the majority of the hauled logs become paper
    or cardboard and not "timber for houses". (The need for burning timber seems
    to be driven for the desire to grow uniform eucalypts, whereas a variety
    of trees would have grown if the coupes were not burnt.)
    This PR method seems to be designed by the timber industry to win over the 
    average public (who do not know the full story). So, perhaps the timber
    industry could start to paint the whole picture for the average public,
    especially as government money is used for many of their TV advertisements in
    Tasmania. Conservationists might begin to have faith in the timber industry
    if they did that.
    
    Anyway, why not, don't they trust the public to make a balanced
    decision when fully informed?
    
    You refered to the mailer's submission, he refered to your antics. 
    Also he blamed you for people unsubscribing. 
    I thought that one reason people might unsubscribe is
    because of the amount of deceptive timber industry PR.

    I believe that people's observations whether casual or rigorous are
    valid as is their desire for answers. I.e. both general and esoteric
    discussions are valid and useful.
    
    Regards.
    Chris Dean
    (cdean@heartland.bradley.edu)
    
    Discalimer: The views, statements or data expressed here are my own and
    do not necessarily represent those of anyone else, nor my employer. 
    
    
    
    

--
---------
Chris
(Dr Christopher Dean, PO Box 550 Mowbray Heights, TAS 7248, Australia)
(Email: cdean@heartland.bradley.edu)





[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0