Forest list archive: msg00004

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Nat. forests=parks?



Doug:
	You are right, you have over simplified the issue.  However, National
Forest are, indirectly, being converted into National Parks.  Either by
making them endangered species recovery areas (i.e. preserves), or
old-growth forest reservations.

	I can't speak for the western US where Forest Service lands make up
a greater percentage of the ownership, but the South is a different story.

	The spotted owl of the Pacific Northwest has received its share of the
press, but the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) is the spotted owl
of the South.

	The US National Forest in the Southeast has been given the 
responsibility of "recovering" the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW).
Southeastern National Forests have been busy designing comprehensive
management strategies on how to manage for this bird.

	These Forests have been given target populations that represent the
required population to guarantee genetic viability of the species.  The
majority of the current populations are genetically isolated and are sure to
dwindle over time if nothing is done.

	The Conecuh National Forest is a good example to back up Doug 
Marshall's discussion of "National Forest=Parks?"

	The Conecuh National Forest Contains approximately 15 mated, and their 
long term strategy target population is 309 mated pairs for "recovery." The
average acreage (habitat) requirement for one mated pair is 200 acres.


Simple Math:   200 acres x  309 mated pairs = 61,800 acres

	This is over 70% of the National Forest that is designated for Timber 
Production.  This is the case throughout the South, and as we look closer
at our forest... more unique ecosystems become apparent and in need of
protection.  Where will this protection take place? 

	There is a desperate need to make environmental protection in the
best interest of private landowners. In the case of the red-cockaded
woodpecker, REGULATION has promoted private landowners to "shoot, shovel,
and shut up."  Aggressive regulation has done more to "harm" the species
than to promote its well being.

	I use to think that National Forest in the South would be made into RCW
preserves, but now I know.


						Sincerely,

						A Practical Environmentalist

 






References:

[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0