Forest list archive: msg00004

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Natural disturbance and clearcutting




    In reply to David Martell's posting with the following comment from
    J.P.  Kimmins:  "They concluded that in many forests,
    clearcutting, done appropriately, provides the closest mimic to
    natural disturbance."

    I am not aware of comprehensive investigations comparing clearcutting
    with natural fire either, but I think it's possible to get a pretty
    good answer to the magnitude of the issue by thinking it through.
    Fire differs from clearcutting by leaving standing snags (and future
    logs) on site, by not compacting the soil, and often by removing much
    of the forest floor.  Are snags and logs important to wildlife and
    site productivity, is compaction a problem, or do litter layers limit
    plant establishment?  To the extent that the answer is yes, and you
    care about it, then clearcuts are different from fires.  Beyond that,
    the differences depend on "typical" fire patterns and logging methods.
    Often fires do not kill all the trees on site, providing onsite shade
    and seed sources.  The difference between fire and clearcuts for
    onsite nitrogen will depend on fire intensity, whether clearcuts are
    burned, and whether whole-tree harvesting removes nutrient-rich
    foliage.  If all you're interested in is growing trees in the short
    term and your species don't benefit from "dead shade" or decayed woody
    substrates, then clearcuts are pretty good mimics.  I hate to conclude
    that "it depends", but your land-use objectives, your natural
    disturbance regimes, and your harvest systems will determine what
    "mimic" means.

    It's important to add, however, that "natural disturbance" is not
    limited to catastrophic wildfire, and that clearcutting is in no way
    similar to wind-throw, beetle-kill, landslide, flood, drought-induced
    mortality, etc. that can be very important for particular species in a
    forest system.

    I do have citations for studies of the effect of different harvest
    methods (e.g. burn or no burn), and of the role of structural legacies
    following natural disturbance in coastal Douglas-fir if they would be
    relevant to your boreal systems.

    Andrew Gray
    Oregon State University
    graya@fsl.orst.edu



[Metla] [Main Index] [Thread Index]

Mail converted by MHonArc 1.1.0